New Work New Problems...
Regrettably, I now have to go back to data analysis of the data collected during the survey.
So far, from the data there has been a highly significant correlation between perceived difficulty of learning(pdl) and the perceived difficulty of use(pdu). The r value was also high at r>0.8
However, a problem arose when a regression against intent was done.
According to the regression, increasing pdl would increase intent by 1.095 (sig=0.05)
However, increasing pdu would DECREASE intent by 0.555 (sig=0.2)
I'm currently very tempted to just disregard pdu altogether since it is not significant even at the 10% level.
Giving in to temptation and regressing intent on ONLY the factors significant at 0.05 level,
Some new facts emerged.
So far, from the data there has been a highly significant correlation between perceived difficulty of learning(pdl) and the perceived difficulty of use(pdu). The r value was also high at r>0.8
However, a problem arose when a regression against intent was done.
According to the regression, increasing pdl would increase intent by 1.095 (sig=0.05)
However, increasing pdu would DECREASE intent by 0.555 (sig=0.2)
I'm currently very tempted to just disregard pdu altogether since it is not significant even at the 10% level.
Giving in to temptation and regressing intent on ONLY the factors significant at 0.05 level,
Some new facts emerged.
Variable | Beta | Significance |
techlit | .235 | less than .001 |
actual usage | -.414 | .002 |
Perceived Behavioural Control | .862 | less than .001 |
Social Interactive Needs | -.339 | .013 |
Perceived Difficulty of Learning | .645 | .001 |
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home